This is good for a chuckle.
Such are the fickle ties of Islamofascism, apparently.
Muhammad Tahir, of the perpetually-stuck-in-the-Cold-War Jamestown Foundation, has a head-scratching theory that Iran would prefer to have two unstable quagmires along its two longest borders, rather than stable pro-Western governments, and thus are arming their own enemies just to stick it to The Man.
Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
Thursday, October 25, 2007
The Lies That Will Start Our War With Iran
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




7 comments:
lol...I love how they declare "Iran is known" to provide assitance to the shiites --- as if that's even possible with American forces gaurding the sea and the border.
And, if their theory about Iran wanting unstable governments at it's border is correct, why isn't it also arming the sunnis as well?
Hey toast-4-brains, Sergei has a response 4 U!
He's a lib, and I don't endorse much of what he says, but seeing as how you're a typical defeatocrat, I think it'd be fun to see how treasonous you will go in an argument to defend al-Kaida!
p.s. IRAN IS GOIN' DOWN!!!!!
We have lost faith in the Lord. He will allow our enemies to detroy us as he as done in the past. We must realize that we have lost the Lord's ways. We need to pray and repent for our lost ways. He our Father may still have mercy on this great nation.
Anonymous 1: They are arming Sunnis as well, if this report is to be believed. The Taliban are Sunni.
Mr. P: Responded, and I've never defended al-Qa'ida (the base) or al-Kaida (the joke). Good try, though!
Anonymous 2: Our most dangerous enemies are within. They're not in Iran.
You should change the name of your blog to "toasterheadsjihadosphere"!
By the way, Sergei has responded.
(don't bail out on us, you've been challenged!)
Good suggestion, P, I think I will! :)
Just callin' 'em as I see 'em.
Post a Comment